Library Reference Desk
(563)-333-6245 / librefdesk@sau.edu
Nursing Librarians
Alison Tollas
(563)-333-6244 / TollasAlison@sau.edu
Hannah Carlton
(563)-333-6474 / CarltonHannah@sau.edu
SAU Library Website
https://www.sau.edu/library
This page introduces introduces frameworks for evaluating the different types of scholarly research conducted in the the health sciences. These categories and definitions will be useful for practitioners conducting Evidence Based Practice and Quality Improvement projects.
Type of Evidence | Level of Evidence | Definitions and Examples |
---|---|---|
Systematic review or metanalysis of Randomized controlled trials (secondary) Evidence based clinical guidelines based on systematic reviews (secondary)
|
I |
Systematic Review: A systematic review of RCTs is a summary of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize multiple RCTs. Meta-analysis: A meta-analysis of RCTs is the statistical analysis of a large collection of data and analysis from independent RCTs that address the same question for the purpose of integrating the findings. |
Randomized controlled trial (primary) |
II |
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT): A RCT is an experiment in which participants are randomly assigned to an experimental group or a control group. The experimental intervention and its alternative(s) are clearly defined and their implementation is closely managed by the researcher. |
Controlled trial without randomization (Quasiexperimental study) (primary) |
III |
Controlled trial without randomization (Quasiexperimental study): A controlled trial without randomization (also known as a quasiexperimental study) is a study in which subjects are assigned to an intervention or alternatives by a method that is not random. The researcher does define and manage the alternatives, which could be treatment and control or two or more interventions. Example: Effectiveness of Oral Sucrose on Level of Pain among Infants after Pentavalent Immunization |
Case-control or cohort study (primary) |
IV |
Case Control Study: A case control study involves identifying patients who have the outcome of interest (cases) and matching and comparing them with individuals who have similar characteristics, but do not have the outcome of interest (controls) to see if these two groups differed with regard to the exposure or contributing factors. Cohort Study: A cohort study involves the identification of a group (cohort) of individuals with specific characteristics in common and follows them over time to gather data about exposure to factors and the development of the outcome of interest. Prospective cohort studies enroll individuals and then collect data at many intervals. Retrospective cohort studies (sometimes called population-based clinical studies) use an existing longitudinal data set to look back for a temporal relationship between exposure factors and outcome development. |
Systematic review of qualitative or descriptive studies (secondary) |
V |
Systematic review of qualitative or descriptive studies: A systematic review of qualitative or descriptive studies is a summary of the medical literature that uses explicit and reproducible methods to systematically search, critically appraise, and synthesize multiple qualitative and/or descriptive studies. |
Qualitative study (primary) Descriptive study (primary) Case study, case report, or case series (primary)
|
VI |
Qualitative study: Qualitative research is used to examine subjective human experience by using non-statistical methods of analysis and gathers data on human behavior to understand why and how decisions are made. Example: Nonpharmacological inventions practiced by neonatal nurses: The example of two hospitals in turkey Descriptive study: Descriptive studies use a variety of methods to observe existing natural or man-made phenomena without influencing it (no researcher intervention). Data are gathered, organized and analyzed to provide an in-depth look at processes, characteristics and patterns and can be quantitative and/or qualitative. Case Study, Case Report, or Case Series: A case study is a descriptive study of one (case study or case report) or a series of subjects (case series) where the unfolding course of events (disease progression, therapies, outcomes, etc.) is described in detail. This study design is used to provide a detailed description of an uncommon disease or condition, a unique situation, or the introduction of a new technique. |
Opinion or consensus | VII |
Opinion or Consensus: Expert committee reports, Narrative and literature reviews, and Opinions from authorities Example: |
Gopalakrishnan, S. & Ganeshkumar, P. (2013). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: Understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 2(1), 9-14. https://doi.org/10.4103%2F2249-4863.109934
Ingham-Broomfield, R. (2014). A nurse's guide to qualitative research. Australian Journal of Advance Nursing. 32(3), 34-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.37464/2015.323.1578
Study designs. (n.d.). Evidence Analysis Library. Academy of Nutrition and Dietics. https://www.andeal.org/study-designs
Quantitative Research Study | Qualitative Research Study | |
---|---|---|
Explanation |
|
|
Data Collection Method |
|
|
Use |
|
|
Sample Size |
|
|
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.